#NyevSham "I do my research from a creationist perspective" go home Fabich you're drunk.
— Mister Id (@Mistr_ID) February 5, 2014
"Secularists" do not hijack science
We simply understand how to evaluate real evidence, unlike our creationist counterparts
#CreationDebate
— Mel who is in Canada (@AtheistMel) February 5, 2014
Also, isn't it a shame they didn't market the #NyeHam debate as "Ham on Nye: Hold the Mayo"? #NoTheWhitePhone
— Timothy Hall BCE (@timtheredmenace) February 5, 2014
#NyeHam 'today's new species in the Cincinnati inquirer...the lesser aardvark'
— Christopher Aucoin (@Chris_Aucoin) February 5, 2014
I don't understand why creationists think God is almighty but too dumb to create a process like evolution. #NyeVsHam
— Christine Elle (@SeaEhmElle) February 5, 2014
Once more, Ham makes claims about the past while simultaneously saying you can't make claims about the past. #NyevSham #teambowtie
— Brian Takle (@wylfing) February 5, 2014
Hint: if you are using the BIBLE as the basis of your world view it has NO place in public schools. GTFO #NyevSham
— Corinna Turbes (@CorinnaTurbes) February 5, 2014
Well, the beer is gone. I guess I have to start on the bourbon. Coping with Ham. #creationdebate #NyevSham
— Maxwell French (@ResidentCynic) February 5, 2014
The moderator would think you were going on for millions of years? I don't think you understand the concept of millions of years. #NyevSham
— Audrey Gonzalez (@AudreyGonzalez) February 5, 2014
Ken Ham: Radioactive dating isn’t reliable, but you know what is? A book of stories that was revised and rewritten over millennia. Me: Um.
— Wil Wheaton (@wilw) February 5, 2014
Bill, the fish are sinners because they keep having fish sex! #obvi #creationdebate
— Andi (@geekfitgirl) February 5, 2014
Ok.. New rule. Every time someone says a number just drink. Because if there is a god, I will die of alcohol poisoning. #creationdebate
— Ms Elyse MoFo Andery (@dELYSEious) February 5, 2014
Ham astronomers who believe YEC: a few. Professionals who don't: 10,000+ #NyeHam
— Gerard van Belle (@gvanbelle) February 5, 2014
I haven't spent a lot of time with lions, but I can tell they have teeth that aren't really suited for broccoli - @TheScienceGuy #NyeHam
— Christopher Aucoin (@Chris_Aucoin) February 5, 2014
Perhaps Noah was Chinese then? They certainly seem to have had better ship building technology.
#NyevSham
— Questionable Adam (@AdamReakes) February 5, 2014
Perhaps Noah was Chinese then? They certainly seem to have had better ship building technology.
#NyevSham
— Questionable Adam (@AdamReakes) February 5, 2014
It's not size of the Ark, says Ham, it was the motion of the ocean. #NyevSham #creationdebate
— Amanda Knief (@mzdameanor) February 5, 2014
Now I know what my favorite Twitter people must feel like when a big sporting event is on. #NyeHam
— Really Ryan? (@SuperXHuman36) February 5, 2014
I’m pretty sure Ham isn’t debating anymore. He’s just trying to get people to pick up faith now. #nyevsham #creationdebate
— Trace Dominguez (@trace501) February 5, 2014
"It is not so much that I have confidence in scientists being right, but that I have so much in nonscientists being wrong."-Asimov
#NyevSham
— Death By Science (@EmbraceTheCoda) February 5, 2014
At what point, during this debate, does god start doubting it's own existence? #NyevSham
— Jake Farr-Wharton (@JakeFarrWharton) February 5, 2014
Dear @TheScienceGuy, please explain the existence of consciousness. You have 60 seconds.
#creationdebate #NyevSham
— ScathingAtheist (@Noah_Lugeons) February 5, 2014
No, Ken Ham. The Bible does not *document* where consciousness came from. It asserts this without supporting evidence. #NyevSham
— Matt Dillahunty (@Matt_Dillahunty) February 5, 2014
Shoutout to Bill Nye for being able to say "I don't know". #TrueScientist #NyeVsHam
— Andrew (@daoustwithaq) February 5, 2014
Just b/c u have a book, does it mean it is accurate or true. #itiscalledfiction #evidence #NyevSham #creationdebate
— Amanda Knief (@mzdameanor) February 5, 2014
Q:"How many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie roll?" A: "Bible! Bible! Bible!" #NyevSham
— Ryan Duffin (@AnimationMerc) February 5, 2014
Ham’s fundamental (ha) argument basically is: because The Bible.
I just can’t accept that any more than I can accept because The Hobbit.
— Wil Wheaton (@wilw) February 5, 2014
Using the claim (the Bible is proof of creationism) for evidence of the claim is circular logic. #CreationDebate #NyevSham #ThatShitDontFly
— OuRR_World (@OuRR_World) February 5, 2014
What would change your mind, Ken Ham? 'As a Christian, I have a foundation, he says.' But doesn't answer. #Creationdebate #HamOnNye
— CFI On Campus (@CFIOnCampus) February 5, 2014
An energy question to an engineer and a full time snake oil salesman. Who will win? #creationdebate #NyevSham #hamonnye #AtheistNotEvil
— Mark Nebo (@marknebo) February 5, 2014
I was imagining a Rick Perry-esque response. The 1st Law of Thermodynamics is this. The 2nd is this. The 3rd... oh shoot. #CreationDebate
— Hemant Mehta (@hemantmehta) February 5, 2014
Ken Ham's favorite color: "The Bible." #CreationDebate
— Hemant Mehta (@hemantmehta) February 5, 2014
I like how Ken Ham is taking the Bill Clinton approach on this--"Well, what do you mean by the word 'literally?'" #NyevSham #creationdebate
— Laura Bedrossian (@LauraBedrossian) February 5, 2014
#NyevSham "Should the bible be taken literally?"
"Allow me to dissemble with the fallacy of redefinition..."
— Reverend Grimothy (@GRIMACHU) February 5, 2014
Ham: "Marriage is between one man and one woman."
Adam: "Again, Ken, there's a book about this..."
#NyevSham pic.twitter.com/95Ci5bZfLT
— Questionable Adam (@AdamReakes) February 5, 2014
HEY KEN http://t.co/FNQJ8FjD5s #NyevSham #creationdebate #hamonnye
— American Atheists (@AmericanAtheist) February 5, 2014
Psalms are poems, you idiots. And Genesis is clearly not a metaphor. Guh! #NyeVsHam
— Scott Griffith (@ScottG13) February 5, 2014
It's not survival of the fittest, it's survival of those who survive WELL A BROKEN CLOCK IS RIGHT TWO TIMES A DAY YALL #NyevSham
— Princess Karen (@jinxloves) February 5, 2014
Although, it's these 2 that really sum it all up.
Holy holey arguments, Batman! #nyevsham
— Ry Crist (@rycrist) February 5, 2014
Ham lost the debate the second he said "nothing/no one could change his mind" Case (and mind) closed. #NyevSham
— reason-being (@logicalbeing) February 5, 2014
It seems the responses to the debate have been more entertaining than the actual debate.
ReplyDeleteThey usually are with stuff like this.
Delete