Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Atheism Plus, The Word "Stupid", and Offense

I recently wrote about not calling all Christians stupid[1]. I stand by that, but I'm not entirely opposed to use of the word "stupid".

More recently, I shared a video by Steve Shives called "5 Stupid Things About the Men's Rights Movement"[2]. Given the subject matter, I thought r/atheismplus[3] might appreciate it. Hell, it's stupid shit like Men's Rights Advocates that make much of what Atheism Plus[4] aims to address necessary.

I was partially right, as the next day, the post was on the front page with a score of 7 (10 upvotes, 3 down).  But I was also partially wrong, as the moderators didn't like it as much.


It was removed because it contained the word "stupid".  The conversation that ensued didn't result in anything productive.  They say their goal is to create a safe space for who are hurt by words like "stupid".  I'm sure they think they're doing something good, but I'm not sure they're doing the good they think they are.

Just the use of the word "stupid" makes them think of the mentally disabled.  In other words, they associate the mentally disabled with stupidity.  They claim to not be attempting to protect them, but that's exactly what they're doing.  They really are taking on the role of White Knight, despite their insistence otherwise.

A cafeteria I frequent employs some mentally disabled people in various roles.  There are two kinds of ways I see people treat them.  Some people treat them like they're anyone else, speaking to them as if they're capable of handling being treated like they're not stupid.  Then there are others, who talk down to them, speaking to them as if they're five years old.  Atheism Plus, or at least the moderators of their subreddit, are of the latter group.

They took offense on behalf of people who never asked for it.  They attempt to defend people from things they do not need defending from.  They're not helping anyone by getting offended at everything.  If anything, they do more damage than good.  They think they're fighting a culture that harms various types of people.  But all they're doing creating a culture that keeps those people down.  A culture that sees them as less than.

When you find offense[5] around every corner, people get used to you being offended.  When they get used to be offended, they tune you out.

Misogyny[6] is real.  Discrimination against the disabled[7] is real.  Both must be fought.  But focusing on words instead of actions doesn't fight either.  Treating people like they cannot handle the real world[8] does not help them.  Plus, it's better to treat people like they're human beings.  After all, human beings is exactly what they are.

This is something I've been gradually noticing, but still hoping wasn't the case, about them.  I want to like Atheism Plus, but shit like this does make it difficult.  Being that overly sensitive is stupid, and I don't think saying that makes me ableist. It makes me realistic.  It makes me someone who doesn't associate the word "stupid" with the disabled.

This incident on Reddit, may not be representative of Atheism Plus.  I certainly hope it's not, and I've had plenty of positive interactions with people who identify as Atheism Plussers.  But the more direct interaction I have with people in leadership positions with Atheism Plus, the less I find myself wanting to defend them.

I'll continue to defend them when I see the irrational hatred they receive, as I still see an insane amount of obsessive hate aimed at them.  My interactions with people who actively oppose Atheism Plus have been far less positive, mostly being reminiscent of conversations with conspiracy theorists & Creationists.    But I don't see myself adopting the label anytime soon.  And I'll definitely be criticizing them when I feel it's warranted.

If the haters are right, I'll be vilified for criticizing them.  I don't expect that to happen though, even despite the unfortunate incident that prompted this post.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  http://aparticularblogbyaparticularatheist.blogspot.com/2013/04/an-open-letter-to-some-atheists.html
2.  http://aparticularblogbyaparticularatheist.blogspot.com/2013/05/five-stupid-things-about-mens-rights.html
3.  http://www.reddit.com/r/atheismplus/comments/1dljqh/five_stupid_things_about_the_mens_rights_movement/
4.  http://aparticularblogbyaparticularatheist.blogspot.com/2012/08/some-atheism-plus-links.html
5.  http://youtu.be/zwoqzb5R6vw
6.  http://www.aclu.org/blog/tag/war-women
7.  http://youtu.be/P7_cMziG1Fc
8.  http://youtu.be/_xrr_gV5K68

Monday, May 20, 2013

Happy Draw Mohammed Day

The original plan was to have this[1] done in advance.  Instead, life got in the way, and I almost forgot about it completely.  I had shut down my computer for the night, only to be reminded of it by a tweet by Steve Shives[2].  So I started it back up & drew this.


Yup, my art skills are that good[3].  Be jealous.  

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day
2.  https://twitter.com/steve_shives/status/336646369634820098
3.  I'll try to get a few of the ones from people with actual artistic ability to share later.

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Saturday Morning Shares - 05-18-2013

Here's the links & tweets to share from the last week.  Most were also shared on this Facebook page or retweeted.  Please add any fun or informative stories I missed in the comments.


Random Stuff:


To Abercrombie and Fitch: My weight was never my worth (via /r/BodyAcceptance/)

'Star Wars Kid' Blasts Bullies, Jedi Knights Defend Him (via @mashable)

20 Animals So Ugly They're Cute (via @mashable)

Sylvia Browne's Failed Amanda Berry Prediction Returns To Haunt Her

Dialect Map Of U.S. Shows How Americans Speak By Region (IMAGE) (via Jennifer)

Photograph shows a lion, tiger, and bear that live together in the same enclosure at an animal sanctuary (via @snopes)

Mark Twain Captured on Film by Thomas Edison in 1909. It’s the Only Known Footage of the Author. (via @Alyssa_Milano)




Science!:


Google Timelapse Shows How Earth Has Changed in 28 Years (via @Alyssa_Milano)


Religion Stuff:


Butthurt Christians Oppressed By Sports Thing That Never Happened (via Becky)

The Myth of Christian Persecution (via /r/Freethought/)

Daddy, Daughter Discuss God (Again); More Cuteness Ensues (via /r/Freethought/)

(via Occupy Bacon)
9 Questions That Atheists Might Find Insulting (And the Answers) (via Sarah)

Atheists to Accept Georgia Governor’s Offer by Sending Atheist Books to State Parks

Pat Robertson marriage counseling: men sometimes cheat – go make the house nice. (via @jteberhard)




Gay Stuff:


George Takei Responds To "Traditional" Marriage Fans (via George Takei)

"Where were you when it mattered?" (via @hemantmehta)

'Geography of Hate' Maps Racist, Homophobic, Ableist Tweets (via @mashable)


Secular Coalition of America's Weekly Update:


National Secular Movement Update Call (05/16/2013)


Asshole Of The Week:

Because:
(via Reaganomics , Raping America since 1981)


Space Porn:


(via /r/spaceporn/)

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

How Do You Discern The Bible's Stance On Homosexuality?

The following is part of a series of posts that will be a public discussion[1] between myself and the Christian author of a blog called "The Discerning Christian"[2].

The issue I've decided to start with is one where we appear to have a lot agreement[3]homosexuality[4]. Plus, it's a topic I care quite a bit about.  I've never understood the bigotry[5] associated with it.  I understand it slightly better since growing up and learning that it is, as far as I've ever been able to find, entirely from the religious, but that just tells me that one illogical stance comes from another.

For Christians who are not anti-gay bigots, I have a few questions.
In discussing homosexuality with Christians, you will generally find that most of them agree that the Church has treated the LGBT community wrongly, and I would agree.
That has not been my experience.  I suspect that it would not be the experience of my gay friends if they were asked. My experience with Christians and homosexuality tends to be more like the rest of that paragraph.
But unless you’re in a church community which actually accepts homosexuality, you will find that everyone has their own pet caveats for why it’s not okay, even though the Church is not treating homosexuals as it should. You will hear comparisons of homosexuality to addiction to pornography or alcohol. You will hear slippery slope arguments, like how will we say no to one night stands or even bestiality if we can’t say no to homosexuality.
Your post is an admirable defense of homosexuality, something that shouldn't even need defended.  But how do you reconcile your reasonable approach to homosexuality with what the Bible says about it?
Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable. - Leviticus 18:22[6]
 If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. - Leviticus 20:13[7]
Do you think you being a Christian, who I presume quotes & reveres the same Bible as Westboro Baptist Church and the countless hate groups whose names contain the word "family", lends credibility to them and others[8] who use the Bible to justify their anti-gay stances[9]?
The ancient people were not stupid, but they did not have the knowledge we have and would have written the Bible in accordance with the way they understood things to be.
Do you think the Bible is the inspired word of your god?  If you can say that the Bible was written by men who were limited by the time they lived in, how do you justify following it?  You clearly think parts of the Bible should be disregarded.  How do you go about deciding which parts to follow and which parts to throw out?
I argue that homosexual Christians should learn to order their desires in the same manner as all other Christians, that they express love and commitment alongside any sort of eroticism. That is the Christian ideal for all sexual desire. That is my hope for homosexual Christians, that they are able to live lives where they can express their homosexuality in a healthy manner and in a way which glorifies God.
You certainly could take a worse approach to it, for instance something like the majority of Christian views on the issue that I encounter.  But I still have a different take on it.  My hope for homosexual Christians is for them to leave the religion that follows a book which says they should be put to death.  My hope for homosexual Christians is for them to abandon the religion that is the driving force behind their status as second class citizens[10].

This probably comes off as harsh, but I don't really know how else to write about this issue.  And it is something about Christianity I've long wondered.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  http://aparticularblogbyaparticularatheist.blogspot.com/search/label/Discerning%20With%20A%20Christian
2.  http://thediscerningchristian.wordpress.com/
3.  http://thediscerningchristian.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/a-christian-defense-of-homosexuality/
4.  http://aparticularblogbyaparticularatheist.blogspot.com/search/label/LGBT
5.  http://aparticularblogbyaparticularatheist.blogspot.com/search/label/Homophobia
6.  http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2018:22&version=NIV
7.  http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2020:13&version=NIV
8.  http://carm.org/bible-homosexuality
9.  http://www.bible.ca/s-homo=sin.htm
10.  http://www.redstate.com/srachui/2013/04/08/why-christians-cannot-support-same-sex-marriage/

Monday, May 13, 2013

Worth Your Attention - FFRFcrankmail

I've been planning a series of posts recommending people to follow for a while, as I've been fortunate enough to found enough such people that I had a backlog of suggestions immediately upon thinking of doing this.

This first in this series, wasn't intended to be first, as it's someone I discovered just a few days ago.  But, because people reading hate mail is one of my favorite things, I like this one enough to want to share it right away.  I'm talking about the the YouTube channel "FFRFcrankmail"[1].

The concept is simple.  Freethought Today[2] is a publication by the Freedom From Religion Foundation[3].  As is common for atheists in public eye[4], they get hate mail.  They publish some of that hate mail in Freethought Today.  The woman behind this channel reads that hate mail for our entertainment.

The best part is that neither of them correct grammar or spelling.  It's printed exactly as written and she reads it exactly as printed.  Including when it's in all caps.  The voices she gives them puts a nice twist on it too.  They attitude she gives the authors of these letters seems to fit pretty well.  She does it well enough to have gotten the attention of Freethought Today[5].

For your viewing convenience, I've included a playlist of the entire series[6] (23 so far).



Perhaps the channel will eventually get popular enough that she's reading her own hate mail[7] like some other atheists[8].

She can also be found on Twitter as @ffrfcrankmail[9].  And thank you to Hemant Mehta for sharing[10] this for me to have found.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  https://www.youtube.com/user/FFRFcrankmail
2.  http://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today
3.  http://ffrf.org/
4.  https://www.facebook.com/davemuscato/posts/10151583163244004
5.  http://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today/item/13958-ellie-says-crank-up-the-sound
6.  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQOFbrCYlDeh4Xz4xewP9bdtDESOJZJEQ
7.  http://youtu.be/-ZuowNcuGsc
8.  http://youtu.be/Oit78WtbKEg
9.  https://twitter.com/ffrfcrankmail
10.  https://twitter.com/hemantmehta/status/332596832507154432

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Discerning With A Christian

I recently put out a request for a Christian blogger to dialogue with[1].  I had several responses.  I will probably end up taking more than one of them up on it, but for now, I'm starting with one. The Christian's blog is called The Discerning Christian[2].

The author describes himself[3] as moderate Christian and not a Biblical literalist.

His stated purpose[4] for the blog is:
This blog exists to equip Christian laymen with the philosophical tools to be more discerning in their understanding of Christianity.
Christianity finds itself at a turning point. For all of its attempts to be “relevant,” which usually involves buying new clothes for the pastors and playing modern styles of music, people are still leaving the faith. For all our apologists, our politicians, etc., etc., people are still leaving the faith.
I can’t blame them. It’s all lipstick on a pig, so to speak.
It is time we started taking our critics seriously. To that end, I write this blog. We don’t need convoluted arguments to keep our faith intact; we need to face reality, and that will change some of the things we believe. A realist does not fear the results of his experiments. The reality is that many lines of thinking in Christianity are inherently corrupt and foster cultures of abuse and intolerance. If we will know the children of God by their love for one another, then we should keep looking. I am here to help you look.
He's a Christian who says he wants to face reality and have coherent arguments.  I'm someone who thinks belief in Christianity (and every other theistic religion) has no rational justification.  This[5] should be a fun exercise.

Only time will tell if it's also productive.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  http://aparticularblogbyaparticularatheist.blogspot.com/2013/04/looking-for-christian-blogger-to-be.html
2.  http://thediscerningchristian.wordpress.com/
3.  http://thediscerningchristian.wordpress.com/about-this-blog/
4.  http://thediscerningchristian.wordpress.com/about/
5.  http://aparticularblogbyaparticularatheist.blogspot.com/search/label/Discerning%20With%20A%20Christian

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Saturday Morning Shares - 05-11-2013

Here's the links & tweets to share from the last week.  Most were also shared on this Facebook page or retweeted.  Please add any fun or informative stories I missed in the comments.

Random Stuff:



(via +Wil Wheaton)


(via @mashable)

Has the internet killed the Loch Ness monster? (via @SkeptInquiry)

15 Pop-Culture Realizations That Will Blow Your Mind


Science!:


Terrifying images from the microscope (16 pictures) (via Science-fact)


Religion Stuff:




(via +Jeff Schneider)
(via Godless Heathens of America)

Why Are Christian Homeschooling Parents Pushing to Expose Their Children to Evolution? (via @hemantmehta)

Elizabeth Smart Speaks Out Against Abstinence Only Education, Mormon Upbringing (via /r/exmormon/)


(via Apostacon)


Political Stuff:



(via Daily Kos)

Getting the Freedom to Die (via American Humanist Association)


Secular Coalition of America's Weekly Update:


National Secular Movement Update Call (05/09/2013)


Asshole Of The Week:


Space Porn:


(via /r/spaceporn/)